FB Group Posts: 5, 6 & 7 May 2021 – Banded Argillite, Trace Fossil Stones and Shades-of-Grey Quartzites

Three more of my recent regular Posts in the Facebook Group “New Zealand Lapidary, Rocks, Minerals, Fossils”. The first Post in this Series is here.

Wednesday 5 May 2021: Banded argillite stone from Gemstone Beach, size around 3.5 cms. Tumble-polished.

Argillite is a hardened, slightly recrystalised, mudstone, mainly grey through to black in colour but can also be green and red (arising from the presence of iron). Green is the most common colour for argillite on Gemstone Beach (with some having trace fossil burrows and trails in them) but some very nice grey banded stones can also be found. This particular stone is unusual as it has a subtle brown hue. Its “bands” or layers show signs of pressure deformation, with the beginnings of a stress fracture line apparent on one side. Tumble-polishing has smoothed the stone well and clarified its colours, though it has not taken a high polish.

Thursday 6 May 2021: In his book “Terrain: Travels Through A Deep Landscape” (2015), Geoff Chapple recalls a walk with the geologist Nick Mortimer along the Southland coast between Colac Bay/Oraka and Riverton/Aparima. On page 253 he writes: “We looked for the tattooed rock, the trace fossils that Maori call mokomoko, and it took some time but we did find them, wetting down the face of a rock layer to reveal 270 million-year-old traces of burrowing worms that took the purple of their starting layer down into the pale depths beneath, or dragged their pale layer into some purple darkness below, working their primitive palette, thousands of small finger painters out of the Permian…” These two tumble-polished trace fossil stones illustrate the dark in the light and the light in the dark (though there is little purple there).

The stones are mudstones, probably argillite, and the burrows and trails left in the ancient ocean floor sediment by these animals millions of years ago have been infilled by much finer sediment (silt?) of a different hue. The sediment has been compacted and cemented, producing this sedimentary rock and preserving the traces – further heat and pressure forms a different rock type (metamorphic) and destroys the traces. I have found such stones on Gemstone Beach and at Riverton/Aparima and, more recently, my wife found two at Whanganui, on South Beach, while riding her horse there. I treat such trace fossil stones lightly in the tumbling process (only one fine grit tumble before polishing) to preserve the traces, and they usually don’t polish highly. But tumbling removes the weathered outer layer and keeps the colours and patterns clear.

Friday 7 May 2021: These three tumble-polished stones come from Birdlings Flat having been collected there at various times over the past four to five years. They are examples of a type of quartzite to be found there, characterised by layers of shades of grey and white.

A quartzite starts off as a quartz-rich sandstone, a sedimentary rock that is grainy and feels like sandpaper. When the sandstone is exposed to high temperatures and pressures, the hard glassy metamorphic rock of quartzite is formed. Technically, more than 90% of the grains in a quartzite are quartz. Quartzite’s wide variety of colours (grey, red, green, yellow, and more) are a result of minor amounts of various minerals being incorporated with the quartz during the process of metamorphism. There are often tiny intricate veins of silica within quartzite stones, along with small clear crystal structures. Quartzites usually polish very well, due to their smoothness, hardness, and high levels of quartz, and their often complex patterns make them very attractive.

The next Post in this Series is here.

FB Group Posts: 2, 3 & 4 May 2021 – Jasper, Breccia and Faultline Stone

Lately I have been making regular Posts in the Facebook Group I belong to, “New Zealand Lapidary, Rocks, Minerals, Fossils”. This Group, with currently just over 4,000 members, is described by its organisers as follows: “The Group is for anyone interested in rockhounding, collecting or any of the rock Lapidary arts. Its focus is on New Zealand material but anyone can contribute overseas material if you worked it here in New Zealand.” It is very useful for someone like me to have a Group that has a local focus. A number of members have expertise in different regions of the country or in different types of rocks. It is also great to get reactions to my own material and ideas, and encouragement from people who share the same passion/obsession.

Some of the Posts I have made recently in this Group are about stones that I have just finished tumble-polishing, other Posts draw on material from TumbleStone Blog, and some relate to current interests of mine. Here are three from early this month (apologies to those who have already seen them before).

Sunday 2 May 2021: Small (3 cm) jasper stone recently tumble-polished, found on Gemstone Beach, Southland, on 28 February this year. Maybe some green epidote also present.

The stone looks like what Jocelyn Thornton refers to as a hematite jasper (page 36 “Beach Pebbles – Orepuki” in “Gemstones”), because of the grey material that the dark red is embedded in. The bright specks in it seem to be the light glinting off the metallic planes. They could be small particles of polish remnants but the stone spent two days in borax after polishing. Also, checking with photos of the stone before it was tumbled, some of the bright glinting seemed to exist at that stage. However, the stone is not metallic – to my surprise, it does not respond to a magnet, so it is highly likely not to have hematite in it. [I later discovered that hematite is very weak magnetically so this stone is very likely to be a hematite jasper.]

Monday 3 May 2021: Small (3 cm) stone recently finished the tumble-polishing process. Found on Gemstone Beach, Southland, about a year ago. It appears to be a brecciated stone, made up of many tiny pieces in a fine-grained matrix.

“Breccia” consists of pieces that have not been rounded much by transport by water, for example, before being cemented together; “conglomerate” consists of more rounded pieces indicating some erosion before being cemented together and thus have travelled further before formation. The fragments may be the result of faulting (even small movements in rocks caused by pressure) or a landslide or something that causes fast erosion. Of course, some stones can consist of both sharp-edged and rounded fragments, confusing the categorisation! One of the potential “problems” with polishing such stones is that different embedded fragments may polish quite differently and some may not polish at all. This stone has polished much better than I expected, despite its complex make-up, with only a couple of tiny un-polished “dots” on one side.

Tuesday 4 May 2021: Recently tumble-polished small mudstone (3 cms long) from Gemstone Beach, Southland.

Often called a “faultline”, “faulted” or “earthquake” stone because of the displacement captured within it. I think of it as an “offset stress fracture” due to the very minor movement that has been frozen in time. Not an unusual type of stone – I have come across a few – but it does attract my attention when I see one of these. This little stone has tumble-polished well, ending up smooth and relatively shiny, though it hasn’t taken a high polish.

See here for the next Post in this Series.

Degrees of Polish Perfection – Four Tumble-Polished Gemstone Beach Stones

I found these stones on Gemstone Beach in February/March 2021. Each stone is really interesting, but two have polished very well and two have minor issues with them.

I found the first stone on the afternoon of Sunday 28 February 2021. I arrived at high tide that day and the waves were initially lapping the cliffs high up on the beach, forcing me to spend the first 40 minutes near the Taunoa Stream, where I fossicked in the stream’s shallow water. This stone, found there in the stream, was one of a handful of outstanding finds that day. It has amazing lines and patterns in it, but I don’t know what kind of stone it is.

The stone is a reasonably big one as far as tumble-polishing goes, being 6 cms by 5 cms. Along with the other three stones, it was tumbled in a 6lb barrel which is able to deal with this size. Initially it spent just over a week in 400 silicon carbide grit to smooth it in preparation for polishing. It was then tumbled in pre-polish and pro-polish tin oxide followed by a two days’ burnishing tumble in borax. The first four photos below are of the stone as found on the beach, with four comparative photos of the polished stone beneath:

The stone polished very well. It is very smooth and has no rough areas. In some ways, however, it is not really a significant improvement on the wet stone as found on the beach – except for one major thing. A polished stone is always bright and clear. A stone as found on the beach shows its colours only when wet – when it is not wet, it is dull and does not reveal its intricacies and intensity.

The second stone was found on Gemstone Beach on Thursday 4 March 2021. It is a larger stone, being 7.5 cms long, again requiring a 6lb barrel to polish. It was the myriad shapes of green hues that caught my eye when I came across it on the beach. The stone is a sedimentary one, probably a mudstone, and the shapes within it are probably some kind of infilled holes or burrows. It is not always possible to achieve a smooth surface on such stones when tumbling them as the infills may not erode or polish at the same rate or to the same degree as the rest of the stone. But this one has turned out great! It is smooth all over.

When you compare the before and after stones (top and bottom respectively), there is not a lot of difference, except that the effects of tumbling can be seen in the often subtle wearing away of the infill shapes.

The third stone, about 5 cms long, was found on Gemstone Beach on Saturday 6 March 2021, the day after a tsunami alert. It may be a volcanic stone which started out with small holes (vesicles) which have been infilled as water has moved through the holes and left minerals behind. These infilled holes provide the stone’s beauty but also pose a challenge for the tumble polisher. The holes may be filled with material that wears away at a different rate than the stone itself, and some may not even take a polish.

While the light-coloured original material of the stone has polished well, the infilled holes show a less favourable outcome. Many of them look clearer prior to tumbling. I found this disappointing. I have had mixed success with stones like these – sometimes a good polish can be achieved for the whole stone. It depends on the nature of the infill mineral. I do wonder whether being tumbled in a finer grit – say 600 – might improve the end product.

The fourth stone was found on Gemstone Beach on my first visit there during my February-March 2021 trip, on Sunday 21 February. The original photos of the stone were taken not on the beach when I found it but back at the crib/bach I was staying at in Riverton. About 6 cms long, this stone is much darker in colour than the third stone but it also has a number of interesting infills. It also has a hole at one end, on one side, with a crack running outwards from it.

The main dark material of the stone has polished well along with the vast majority of the infills. Some changes can be seen in the shape of the infills, due to the wearing arising from tumbling in fine grit. The hole remains, basically unchanged. To remove the hole by tumbling in a coarse grit would reduce the size of the stone significantly and I decided not to do that. Such a hole actually reveals the internal nature of the stone and can sometimes be quite interesting. The crack has maybe become a little more pronounced. Overall, I am pleased with the polish on most of the stone.

Tumble polishing is an art, not a science. It is imprecise, dependent on the stone and its constituents, the starting conditions of the stone, and the skill of the tumble polisher to follow various steps carefully. It also depends on what the tumble polisher wants to achieve with a particular stone. Tumble polishing usually leads to amazing clarification of the surface of a stone, a clarification that does not simply fade away in a few minutes as happens with an unpolished stone that is wet.

“A” is for “Amygdaloidal” and “B” is for “Botryoidal Chalcedony”

Recently the Facebook Group I belong to, “New Zealand Lapidary, Rocks, Minerals, Fossils”, invited its members to submit photos each week of a stone, mineral or fossil in their collection that starts with a letter of the alphabet. It is currently the second week in the series.

For the first week, the following was my submission:

“A” is for “Amygdaloidal” – a stone from Gemstone Beach, Southland. An amygdale (amygdule) is an infilled vesicle [tiny hole originally formed by a gas bubble] on a volcanic stone, the term coming from Latin for almond reflecting the almond-shape of many such vesicles. Some of the ones in this stone are more circular than usually found. (So “amygdaloidal” is a term like “conglomerate” and “breccia”, denoting the way the stone has formed rather than the material it consists of.)

This week, I made this submission:

“B” is for “Botryoidal Chalcedony”. This stone was found in March this year on a small beach with sentinel seals at either end, south-east of Moeraki Village in North Otago. Thanks to Oliver Simpson for pointing me in that direction. In his 1954 book “The Pebbles on the Beach”, UK author Clarence Ellis writes of botryoidal chalcedony (p. 86): “Its surface is raised in rounded lumps suggestive of a bunch of grapes or a collection of soap bubbles.” (The Greek word for a bunch of grapes is “botrus”.) So “botryoidal” is a term relating to the surface shape of a stone, not what it is made of. Though there is a kind of relationship, to fibrous crystals. Clarence Ellis continues: “When broken, chalcedony is seen to be of a fibrous structure. Extremely thin fibres that look like hairs radiate out from the centre of each rounded lump to its surface.”

(For an account of the discovery of this stone, see this Post, Day 20. For a little more information on Ellis’s book, see this Post.)

The next Posts in this Series can be found here. An Index to the whole Series can be found here.