Part One examined in detail the public summary of an Application to mine gemstones from Gemstone Beach. This Post examines my own and other people’s reactions to finding out about it.
Right at the beginning of August, I arrived in Southland for some fossicking at Gemstone Beach. A couple of days later, I met someone on the beach who told me that an Application to mine gemstones, garnets and quartz there had been made. No further details were mentioned. I wasn’t sure what to make of it. Someone else then mentioned it too, but again no other details were known. At that stage, I contacted the Southland District Coucil asking if such an application had been made. They replied that I should contact Environment Southland who deal with resource consents for the area. I did so and they replied that no application had been made to them. By this stage, in mid-August, the issue had appeared on social media, on local area pages and rockhound groups. Nearly everyone had some concern about the implications for the beach, for public access, and for the future of casual fossicking on it. No consultation had occurred – this was the first time anyone had heard about it. I mentioned the appearance of the issue in one of my regular fossicking Posts.
It also became clear around this time that the Application had in fact been made to NZ Petroleum and Minerals, and a summary of it was found. The summary of the Application didn’t allay any of the concerns and fears. It said that gemstones, garnets and quartz were to be mined along this coast, that the area concerned was quite large (47.59 hectares), the permit was to be for ten years, and it wasn’t a hobby or recreational operation but was to include surface mining. In the absence of any other information, people were not sure what surface mining would entail, but it certainly didn’t sound nice. How would access to the beach be affected? Would mining activity spoil the beach for locals and tourists alike? How might it impact the economy of the small town of Orepuki if it made it a lot less attractive for passing motorists to call in? And what would be the implications for the casual fossicking of rockhounds that has always occurred there? Why should one person be given this power over the beach? A lot of people sent emails to NZ Petroleum and Minerals strenuously objecting to any mining of the beach or the restriction of access to it. One newspaper report referred to emails “jamming” the in-box of MBIE (Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment, of which NZ Petroleum and Minierals is a part), and another referred to the “severe backlash” to the Application.
A few people on social media said that all the reaction was a storm in a tea-cup. They were sceptical that the Application would amount to much. They pointed out that the gemstones had very little value and that anyone interested in them would only be able to collect them on a very small scale. For example, the miner would likely use a quad bike with a trailer carrying a sluice to search for and collect the gemstones. But there remained questions about why the Application had been made if that was the case, and what the implictions were for access and casual fossicking.
For the reaction of a fellow Gemstone Beach fossicker and blogger, see “My thoughts on the Gemstone Beach Mining Permit Application” in Tumble and Polish.
*** ***
Part Three looks at the Applicant’s response in newspaper articles to this public reaction. Part Four clarifies current Environment Southland regulations concerning the removal of stones from beaches.












