A Blog About Stone Gathering, Tumbling and Polishing, and Rocks and Landscapes, from New Zealand – With Musical Interludes (john.tumblestone@gmail.com)
I wrote this Review for the October 2025 edition of “StoneSpeak”, the Newsletter of the Southland Geological and Lapidary Club. The following is a slightly fuller version. My first Review of an online resource for “StoneSpeak” was of Peter Ballance’s e-book (2017) “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”. The Southland Club’s website is here and its Facebook Page is here.
Page 1 of “StoneSpeak” Newsletter, October 2025.
Page 5 of “StoneSpeak” Newsletter, October 2025.
Page 6 of “StoneSpeak” Newsletter, October 2025.
This website (https://rocksminerals.flexiblelearning.auckland.ac.nz) was produced by the University of Auckland’s Department of Geology in 2005. It provides very good introductory information about minerals and rocks in a New Zealand context. The language used manages to avoid over-simplification and usefully explains many key technical terms about geology and rocks. For example, on Clastic Sedimentary Rocks: “The fragments of pre-existing rocks or minerals that make up a sedimentary rock are called clasts. Sedimentary rocks made up of clasts are called clastic (clastic indicates that particles have been broken and transported). Clastic sedimentary rocks are primarily classified on the size of their clasts” (see first photo below). The website is illustrated with a number of photos of mineral and rock specimens from the University’s Geology Department collection.
When I find a stone on a beach, I often go to Jocelyn Thornton’s book “Gemstones” for help to identify it. Or I post a photo on a New Zealand rockhound Facebook Group, asking for an identification. Often I get a name for the stone, such as argillite or gabbro. I can then go to this University of Auckland website, a more geology-oriented source, to get some information on argillite or gabbro.
There are five sections in this website: Home, The Geology of Auckland, Minerals, Rocks, and Glossary. I have most often consulted the Minerals and Rocks sections to gain an understanding of the types of stones I find on the beach. The most useful parts of the Minerals section are Properties (eight are outlined) and Common Rock-Forming Minerals (21 are described). One of the limitations of the website can be seen here – it doesn’t always do a good job of dealing with the range of types of a mineral or rock (always a difficult task). So its photos of Garnet, for example, are all of one type and don’t include the likes of grossular and hydrogrossular.
The Rocks section includes important Features to look for when writing descriptions and identifying rocks. To take Texture as an example: “Texture refers to the shape, arrangement and distribution of minerals or grains / clasts within the rock – the texture in a geological sense does NOT refer to the roughness of the surface of the rock”. Then 12 igneous, eight sedimentary and seven metamorphic rocks are described. These entries include a basic description, photos of usually one to four specimens (up to seven in a couple of cases), and a list of basic properties. I especially like the chart that is a guide to the identification of igneous rocks based on their mineral composition.
I use this website whenever I want to check out a particular mineral or rock. Its New Zealand focus is its strength, along with its careful balance of technical detail and understandable explanation. I always want it to provide more information, and I wish it had more photos of specimens, but this doesn’t detract from its value.
The next Review in this Series is of Jocelyn Thornton’s (1985) “Gemstones”. An Index to this Series is here.
I am a member of the Southland Geological and Lapidary Club.The Club’s website is here and its Facebook Page is here.“StoneSpeak” is the monthly Newsletter of the Club, and I have been writing a series of Reviews of Online Resources and some other Articles for it since June 2025. I have posted usually slightly extended versions of these in TumbleStone Blog. The aim of the Reviews are to provide a bit of backgound and context to an online geological or lapidary resource, describe what’s in it, and evaluate its strengths and limitations.The Articles are on various topics. This Series is likely to be ongoing.
I wrote this Review for the August 2025 edition of “StoneSpeak”, the Newsletter of the Southland Geological and Lapidary Club. The following is a slightly fuller version. My first Review of an online resource for “StoneSpeak” was of Peter Ballance’s e-book (2017) “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”. The Southland Club’s website is here and its Facebook Page is here.
The website www.mindat.org describes itself as “the world’s leading authority on minerals and their localities, deposits, and mines worldwide”. Wikipedia describes it as “the largest mineral database and mineralogical reference website on the Internet”. I assume its name is a shortening of the phrase “mineralogical data”. The mineral entries, localities, and photographs in Mindat are really useful material even if you aren’t interested in a lot of the technical detail and resources in it. Mindat is not a website that will help you identify a stone you have found while fossicking. But once you have an idea of what mineral is in the stone, Mindat will tell you all about that.
Mindat is the brainchild of Jolyon Ralph, an Englishman. His story of its origin starts: “On Christmas Day 1993, there was nothing good on television. So I went upstairs to my room and started writing mindat”. He was 23 years old, and trying to produce mineralogical information in an accessible form. It was initially a personal computer database. He then uploaded it onto the internet as a website in October 2000. At the same time, it became a community-editable venture – other people could contribute material. Contributors to the database are vetted to ensure the accuracy of their material and expert knowledge. The history of Mindat as a website can be found here. Ralph was awarded the Mineralogical Society of America’s Distinguished Public Service Medal in 2011 for his work on Mindat (see here for a shaky and sometimes blurry YouTube video of the award presention). In 2014, Mindat was transferred to the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy who have operated it since.
The main strength of Mindat is the information it provides on different minerals. It includes useful descriptions as well as a lot of technical detail. However, the amount of information varies depending on how much work has been done on the entry. For example, “Chalcedony” is well-developed but “Hydrogrossular” is quite thin. Standard entries have a selection of photos at the top with links to more images, something I have used quite a bit. Entries have sections on such topics as physical properties, optical data and fluorescence, crystallography and crystal structure, chemistry, varieties, localities, and references.
The references provided by Mindat include key documents on a mineral and usually have URL links to download them – that is how I got access to Colin Hutton’s 1943 article on hydrogrossular where he first described it from samples in Nelson. The localities for a mineral don’t cover all places it can be found but usually just the most significant. For hydrogrossular, four New Zealand localities are recorded (despite the map initially showing only three): two in Northland, one in Marlborough and one on the West Coast. Te Waewae Bay (Gemstone Beach), where I find my hydrogrossulars, is not mentioned. As stated in a review of Mindat for educators and students, “Although this database is maintained and enriched by an army of volunteers who strive to ensure the accuracy of the data, you may still want to consult one or two other sources to cross check the information.”
I wrote this Review for the July 2025 edition of “StoneSpeak”, the Newsletter of the Southland Geological and Lapidary Club. The following is a slightly fuller version. My first Review in this Series was of Peter Ballance’s e-book (2017) “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”. The Southland Club’s website is here and its Facebook Page is here.
“GeoTrips” is a GNS Science website containing a number of relatively brief fieldtrip guides to places in New Zealand. Its “About” page states: “These GeoTrips are rock outcrops, geological displays or landforms that you can visit and explore in New Zealand. They have been compiled by GNS Science with the kind assistance of geologists and knowledgeable enthusiasts from around the country… We encourage you to go and visit these locations to discover for yourself the amazing story of New Zealand’s geology and natural processes.” Up until recently, GNS Science was the Crown Research Institute for Geological and Nuclear Science. On 1 July this year, GNS Science merged with NIWA, the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, to become Earth Sciences NZ, its new website being www.earthsciences.nz.
The main person behind GeoTrips, Julian Thomson of “Out There Learning” (see photo above, right), is maybe New Zealand’s leading geology educator and communicator. In 2019 he was awarded the Science Communicators Association of New Zealand prize for leading the creation of the GeoTrips website. He writes: “GeoTrips has several hundred locations around the country that are publicly accessible and robust enough to cope with foot traffic. They are rated for quality, include a health and safety comment and show images and give background information on the geology of the area.”
The GeoTrips website has a map on which all the trips are located. There are 12 in Southland. For example, “Howells Point Volcanics” takes you to the Back Beach of Riverton Aparima.
The “Howells Point Volcanics” GeoTrip was compiled by Jasmine Mawson who had completed a Masters thesis in Geology at the University of Otago in 2018, on the topic of submarine volcanism along the coast between Riverton and Colac Bay Oraka. Her GeoTrip looks specifically at hydrothermally altered pillow lavas, volcaniclastics and dikes. Each Geotrip has three sections (see photos above). “What’s Here?” is a summary – for Howell’s Point Volcanics, it’s “An undersea pillow lava pile, along with violently erupted volcanic breccia, cross cut by dikes and all hydrothermally metamorphosed”. Section two is “Learn About It”, often a paragraph or two providing details of the geology or landform. Section three is “Have A Look!”, containing one or more photos with further explanation. There are usually more photos at the top of the GeoTrip’s page, seven of them in the case of Howell’s Point Volcanics. Make sure you look throgh the top photos each time you visit a GeoTrip.
The GeoTrip for Southland’s Gemstone Beach was written by Nick Mortimer, a well-known GNS Science geologist. In the “What’s Here?” section, he notes that the ones on Gemstone Beach’s are not eroded out of the cliffs there but have travelled down the Waiau River from Fiordland and have been transported east along Te Waewae Bay. In “Learn About It”, he describes the hydrogrossular garnets that can be found on the beach: “The hydrogrossulars have come from somewhere else. That somewhere is the Countess Range where the garnets form in rocks called rodingites in the Dun Mountain Ophiolite Belt. They have been tumbled and polished in a 150 km journey down the Eglinton and Waiau valleys.” Other Southland GeoTrips include Riverton Aparima’s Te Hikoi Museum, McCracken’s Rest (just west of Gemstone Beach), the Clifden Caves, Mount Titiroa (south of Manapouri), Bluff’s Stirling Point, Waipapa Point in the Catlins, and the petrified wood forest at Curio Bay.
Among the GeoTrips I am familiar with are three for Ward Beach in Marlborough (see photos above). I visit this beach two or three times each year and have found these GeoTrips especially interesting and informative. One of them highlights the uplifted rocks and abandoned Flaxbourne River estuary that resulted from the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake. The second examines the Ward Beach boulders while the third is on the Chancet Rocks Reserve, featuring the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary (formerly known as the K-T boundary) – “This layer has been recognised worldwide and marks the end of the Age of the Dinosaurs, caused by a devastating asteroid impact that struck part of where Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula is today.” I often wish more information, and more photographs, were included in a GeoTrip. However, they are a valuable resource for drawing attention to some very interesting geological places, and some have led me to conduct my own follow-up research to find out more.
GeoTrips is one of many resources listed on the excellent “Geoscience Education & Outreach Resource Database”, compiled by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand. This online database contains over 150 publicly accessible Geoscience Resources from New Zealand and the world. Some are similar to GeoTrips, such as the USA-based Geology Virtual Trips. Others are more ambitious, allowing the viewer to explore a virtual landscape online, such as Stanford University’s “Virtual Field Trips”, which includes a set looking at coastal geology and volcanology around Auckland and the North Island. Lying somewhere in-between is “Geo Virtual Field Trips – Greece”, which provides photos and text in more detail than GeoTrips.
The next Review in this Series is of Mindat.org. An Index to the Series is here.
I wrote this Review for “StoneSpeak”, the Newsletter of the Southland Geological and Lapidary Club, and it appeared there in June 2025. The following is a slightly fuller version.The Club’s website is here and its Facebook Page is here.
June 2025 Edition of Newsletter of Southland Geological and Lapidary Club.
My Review in the June 2025 Newsletter of Southland Geological and Lapidary Club.
Peter Ballance’s excellent “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide” was published as an e-book in 2017. It is available for free download from the Geoscience Society of New Zealand here. It is not a book to help you identify a stone – rather, it is a consideration of New Zealand’s geology within a tectonic plate framework. It can be patchy in its coverage, due to how it came to be published (after the author’s death, before he had completed it), but it contains numerous small sections and diagrams which provide insights into a range of geological matters. These include the weathering of greywacke to clay (page 57), the formation of pillow lava (pages 70-71), rhyolite volcanism and ignimbrite (pages 127-129), the Moeraki boulders (pages 263-264), Curio Bay (page 275), the tectonic zone from Te Waewae Bay to Te Anau (page 286), and Nelson’s Boulder Bank (page 377).
Page 57 of Peter Ballance’s “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”.
Page 128 of Peter Ballance’s “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”.
Page 275 of Peter Ballance’s “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”.
Page 286 of Peter Ballance’s “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”.
Peter Ballance was an Englishman who came to teach at New Zealand’s University of Auckland in 1961. He taught geology there until his retirement in 1998. He died in 2009. A 2004 article on Ballance in the “New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics” states: “In New Zealand geological circles, Peter is well regarded for his high standards, the personification of the perfect gentleman who has always shared his data and knowledge with anyone who is interested, and being scrupulously fair in his appraisal or criticism of the work of others.”
“New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide” was Ballance’s retirement project. However, the final draft was not quite complete before his death and other people compiled, formatted and edited his writings and updated his illustrations and maps. The book describes aspects of the geology of New Zealand in some depth, with efforts being made to communicate clearly to the general reader. The text is accompanied by over 100 colour photographs and a comparable number of colour maps and illustrations. A review in the Geoscience Society Newsletter makes the following observations: “It is written with very clear explanations, using non-technical language and supplemented with many excellent diagrams, maps, and photos, making the content accessible to interested non-specialists. At the same time, with nearly 400 pages of densely packed information, this is not a light read, but something to invest considerable time and effort in. Anyone who does so will be richly rewarded with fascinating insights into a myriad of processes and events that have created our multifaceted landscape.” I wouldn’t say all the language is non-technical – some effort is required at times to follow the use of geological terms.
Page 7 of Peter Ballance’s “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”.
The book is in three parts. The first part is an introductory section dealing with the dating of rocks, plate tectonic processes and the New Zealand plate boundary, followed by an overview of the development of the continent of Zealandia. Part two describes eight geological regions of New Zealand’s North Island with Part Three consisting of nine chapters dealing with the South Island’s regional geology. Chapter 16 is on Southland and Stewart Island/Rakiura but is perhaps the most disappointing chapter in the book – it feels underdone to me, perhaps incomplete. But this is the kind of book that I go to from time to time to clarify some of the context to the stones I find on local beaches. Unfortunately, there is no index provided, so it’s a matter of hunting through the pages for what might be relevant. But every now and then, I strike gold there. And I find myself reading more, purely out of interest.
The next Review in this Series is of the New Zealand “Geotrips” website. An Index to the Series is here.
Pages 18 & 19 of Jocelyn Thorton’s “Gemstones” (1985)
Pages 64 & 65 of Jocelyn Thorton’s “Gemstones” (1985)
Pages 68 & 69 of Jocelyn Thorton’s “Gemstones” (1985)
This valuable booklet, now hard to find in secondhand bookstores, used to be available online on Peter Thornton’s website [www.peterthornton.com/files/nzgemstones.pdf]. I briefly reviewed it in TumbleStone Blog back in 2016 (see here) and have often referred to it, for example, in Posts on Gemstone Beach and Slope Point. However, I noticed a few weeks ago that it was no longer available. I have managed to find two alternative ways to access it online.
The first (and probably the best) is via an information site on Tuatapere, a town not far from Gemstone Beach. The site is called “On Natures Edge – Tuatapere” and its “What’s Here” section has a brief page on Gemstone Beach www.onnaturesedge.co.nz/tuatapere/whats-here/gemstone-beach. This page has a link to Thornton’s booklet (see below). Clicking on the link brings up a pdf file of the booklet, the same file as used to be available on Peter Thornton’s website. By clicking here, you can go directly to the pdf.
The second alternative source is through StudyLib.net (see below) – click here. It can take a little time to load, and initially the pages look small, but it appears to be a good reproduction. You can scroll down through the pages within the file, and can zoom in to a size that suits you. The links in the Contents page are shortcuts to other pages, as in the pdf file in “On Nature’s Edge”.
Note that the booklet itself contains 74 pages, each side of each sheet being numbered. The pdf files, however, counts two facing pages as only one page, reducing the page numbers by half.
The pellets are stored according to the type of grit or polish used, to avoid cross-contamination.
Cover of Lortone’s instruction booklet.
Pages 8 and 9 of Lortone’s instruction booklet.
One of the issues facing rotary tumble polishers like myself is the use of “media” in a barrel. As RockTumbler.com puts it: Tumbling media has four functions: 1) it delivers grit to hard-to-reach rock surfaces; 2) it is used to cushion fragile rock materials during the tumbling process; 3) it is used to improve the tumbling action in the tumbler barrel; and 4) it is used as a filler to make up for lost [or inadequate] volume. An instruction booklet that comes with Lortone tumblers, “Professional Gemstone Tumbling”, refers on page 8 only to the use of plastic pellets as an option that can be considered, especially during the latter two stages of tumbling (see photos above right). My supplier, Rotorua Lapidary, stocks plastic pellets and offers them as an integral part of tumble polishing (see here). I have incorporated them into my tumbling routine, always using a few even with coarse grit, increasing the number with each stage. Item 8 in my Posts on What Do I Need to Start Tumble Polishing Stones Myself? And What Will It Cost Me? explains my use and storage of plastic pellets. I am very careful not to lose pellets down the drain when rinsing stones from the barrel, assiduously checking for them even where the water drains onto the ground outside my tumbling shed. However, once I became aware that tumbling especially with coarser grit actually wears away the pellets, no doubt releasing microscopic bits of plastic into the environment, I started to have second thoughts. I would like to minimise the amount of plastic I am responsible for in the environment. The following is my initial research into alternative tumbling media, looking at the advice and information given by various sources.
Hart, top half of page 29, on plastic pellets.
Hart, bottom half of page 29, on plastic pellets.
Some of the ceramic shapes I bought from The Little Red Store.
Hart, top of page 22, photos of ceramic media.
Hart, bottom of page 22, photos of ceramic media.
Hart, top of page 58, on ceramic media.
Hart, bottom of page 58, on ceramic media.
A good starting point for research on any tumble polishing matter is Steve Hart’s “Modern Rock Tumbling”, published in the USA in 2008, what I have called “the best rock tumbling book around”. Hart mentions the use of plastic pellets but states that he prefers ceramic media (see photos above). [He also notes that if he does use plastic pellets, it tends to be mainly for the later stages of tumbling, and he uses them only once before relegating them for use at earlier stages.] On pages 27-28, Hart writes: I have learned to use non-abrasive ceramic shapes in assorted sizes in order to make up for any errors in making up the “perfect” assortment of sizes and to act as a cushion for brittle batches. Use 1 to 2 tablespoons of ceramic shapes for every pound of rocks to start – then make up for lost volume with the shapes [if necessary]. I bought some of Hart’s ceramic shapes in 2016 from his Little Red Store located in California. I used them on a 320 grit load but thought they might have damaged a couple of stones. So I set them aside and have not yet come back to them, partly because the plastic pellets work so well. I have seen comments on the Facebook Group “New Zealand Lapidary, Rocks, Minerals, Fossils” by people who have found ceramic media to work effectively for them.
One rock tumbling retailer in the US, who runs the RockTumbler.com website, summarises the use of plastic pellets versus ceramic media here in the following way: Plastic pellets were the most popular tumbling media from the 1960s through the 1990s. They were used to cushion the stones and reduce bruising caused during tumbling. Today most people use ceramic media, but some have used plastic pellets for decades and still prefer them for rotary tumbling. Ceramic cylinders smooth the tumbling action and this results in less bruising of the stones. Ceramic media is also hard and more effective at grinding and shaping stones. When ceramic media became popular in the early 2000s, most people who tried it stopped using plastic media – because ceramics were more convenient. When using plastic pellets, the pellets can only be used with one size of grit – because tiny particles of grit become embedded within them. When using ceramic pellets, the rock mud and the grit rinse right off of the stones between tumbling steps. Here is the verdict of our customers: Today we sell over 10 times more ceramic media than plastic media. One way to expand our knowledge of the alternatives to plastic pellets is to ask, What did tumble polishers use before plastic pellets? It is worth consulting older literature for the answer.
Page 56 of Lyn & Ray Cooper (1966).
Page 126 of Natalie Fernandez (1981).
Mainly in the first year of my tumble polishing, I managed to buy a few older books on tumble polishing, primarily from Great Britain, the United States and New Zealand. The following three paragraphs summarise the kind of advice given in some of them. Firstly, two New Zealand books: Lyn and Ray Cooper’s (1966) “New Zealand Gemstones” does not mention tumbling media when going through the various stages, though noting that smaller stones can be used as fillers. When discussing how to tumble softer stones, their section on obsidian states (pages 55-56): The polish consists of 2 lb of tin oxide, 1 lb of sugar and 1 cup of Rinso to each 10 lb of stones… Various overseas publications suggest the use of fillers such as plastic pellets for obsidian and soft stones; we do not recommend them. We have used plastic pellets and found that our Rinso and sugar additives give exactly the same, if not better results.Natalie Fernandez (1981), in “The New Zealand Rockhound”, also mentions “hard small beach stones” as a filler (page 126). On the same page, when discussing the polishing stage, she writes: Suitable fillers if required at this stage are saw-dust, shavings, rubber strips, even walnut shells and kitty litter. She goes on to add a note about role of sugar: Adding a little sugar slightly thickens the mixture which keeps the polishing material in suspension.
Fletcher (1972), page 69.
Fairfield (1973), page 16.
Firsoff & Firsoff (1975), page 181.
Shore (1978), page 84.
Next, to look at four British books (see photos above). In “Pebble Polishing” (1972), Edward Fletcher does not mention tumbling media when he provides instructions for the various stages of tumbling. However, for the polish stage, he mentions on page 69 that “wallpaper adhesive” can be used to prevent the cracking and scratching of stones when “any harsh banging or unrhythmical striking of pebbles together” is heard: Add a small amount of wallpaper adhesive to the mixture. The aim is to thicken the liquid in the barrel so that it cushions the fall of each pebble. Do not make the mixture too thick, otherwise the effectiveness of the polishing agent could be reduced. A thin cream consistency is ideal…It also increases the time you must allow for the polish to do its work because movement inside the barrel is reduced owing to the greater viscosity of the thickened liquid. A polishing stage of four days without paste might take seven days if paste is added. Secondly, Del Fairfield’s (1973) “Lapidary” mentions quite a range of tumbling media though for use only at the polish stage: It is customary to add a quantity of soft material to the barrel to provide cushioning during the polishing process and also to carry the polishing material. Various materials have their advocates, including leather, wood, hardboard, plastic granules, cork crumbs etc. Leather, for instance, should be heavy soling leather cut into 1/2-inch squares, and wood should be in 1/2-inch cubes. This additional material should be about one-third the volume of the stones, and when stones, cushions and slurry [tin oxide or cerium oxide] are all mixed up there should be an adequate coating over everything but not much spare slurry (page 16). Thirdly, V.A. Firsoff and G.I. Firsoff, in “The Rockhound’s Handbook” (1975), also recommend the use of “small pea-sized stones” which “ensure more intimate contact between the main charge [stones] and the abrasive” (page 181). They mention the use of “vermiculite” to cushion the stones at the polishing stage (page 182). Vermiculite is a hydrous phyllosilicate mineral (see Wikipedia), a mica-like mineral, and one of its commercial uses is as an addition to potting soil in containers, helping to improve drainage and moisture retention. Finally, Eric Shore includes the following comments in his “Lapidary for Pleasure and Profit” (1978) when discussing the polish stage: Additives either of cubes of hardwood, pieces of felt, or leather should be added to the charge [stones, polish powder and water] to give a cushioning effect whilst tumbling. These will help prevent chipping 0f sharper edges and points and also act as a polisher when rubbing against the stones. If leather is used, thick pieces are better than thin, as the latter tend to cling to the barrel and not mix with the stones (page 84). He also mentions that sawdust can be used, along with detergent, in the final burnish.
James (1965), page 97.
Hyde & Matthews (1977), page 33.
Hyde & Matthews (1977), page 34.
An Australian book published in 1965, Bill James “Collecting Australian Gemstones”, actually mentions “plastic granules” to prevent damage during polishing for “special” stones (page 97), but is silent on tumbling media for the routine stages for most stones (see photos above). A book published in the USA in 1977 mentions tumbling media, and gives mainly similar advice to the British authors reviewed above. “The Complete Book of Rock Tumbling” by Christopher Hyde and Richard Matthews has a section on “Buffering Agents”: These are used to carry the abrasive and also to prevent severe impact of one stone against the other… Such materials include wood chips, plastic pellets, sawdust, sugar and wallpaper paste… Old-timers often had their own favorite additives, which helped to make rock tumbling a mysterious art. These included products such as walnut shells, rice hulls and even banana peels. Although such things may work, we don’t recommend using them (pages 33-34).
In Part Two in this Series (not yet available), I will review some contemporary internet information on tumbling media.
In Maps as a Resource: New Zealand’s “Maps Past”, Part One and Part Two, I demonstrate ways in which the “Maps Past” website provides maps of interest to researchers. The following is a step-by-step introduction to using the website for those who might find it useful.
Step One: Go to http://www.mapspast.org.nz. The following (or something similar) is likely to open as the home page:
The next two steps are aimed at getting rid of unnecessary material from the screen before zeroing in on a location of interest.
Step Two: Get rid of the “Select basemap” pop-up menus by clicking on the “x” on it (circled in black on the image below):
Step Three: Remove the text material from the lefthand side of the page by clicking on “Mapvv” (partly circled in black in the image below) which is on the righthand margin at the top:
This then should leave you with a map of New Zealand and seven icons at the left top of the page:
The seven icons are:
From left to right:
White plus and minus signs on blue background = Zoom in/Zoom out.
Three layers icon = “Select basemap” = Brings up list of 14 options, most of them decades.
Cog icon = “Map options, Coordinate format” = Brings up list of 11 options.
White i in blue circle = “Show mapsheet details for current series when you click on the map”.
Clipboard list with white i in blue circle on bottom right corner = “List all available mapsheets at point you click on the map”.
Magnifying glass with three arrows = “Zoom to extent of current mapsheet/series”.
Two chain links = “Show URL of currently displayed map”.
Below I will discuss the use of four of these icons – the first, second, fourth and fifth. I have found that I can achieve what I want through using these four.
Step Four: Use the “Zoom in” icon (white plus sign on blue background at top left of screen) to zoom in to the location you want to examine. You are likely to also need to move the map to bring your intended location to the centre of the screen – move the cursor to somewhere on the screen, click and hold, then move the cursor – this will move the map. I have chosen to zoom in on Riverton at the bottom of the South Island (see below). At the bottom right hand of the screen are some figures, the scale of the map on screen, the map sheet or series, and co-ordinates of the cursor. In this case, for example, there is “Scale = 1 : 27K” (27K = 27000) and “NZTM2000” map series. This information may or may not ever be of use to you.
Step Five: Once you have zoomed in to the location you want, at the scale or level of detail you want, you can then click on the “Select basemap” icon (three layers icon) at the top left to choose which map you want to see.
I decided to try to find the earliest map. I clicked on the fourth last map “NZMS13 1899”. The list then disappeared and the screen went blank. This means such a map does not exist. I clicked again on the “Select basemap” icon to bring the list of maps up again, and clicked on “NZMS13 1909”. Same blank result. When I next clicked on “NZMS13 1919”, the following map came up:
The 1929 map was the same. The 1949 map was not at a good level of detail:
But the 1959 map was a good one:
And we could go on, choosing more recent maps or the air photo…
Step Six: Finding out what maps are available for the location. To do this, you click on the icon of a clipboard list with white i in blue circle on bottom right corner – this is to “List all available mapsheets at point you click on the map”. This icon turns green when you click on it. You then click on a point on the map and a popup list appears which you can scroll down. This lists all maps that have been published or are available for this location.
The earliest map listed for Riverton is Series: NZMS13 Sheet: SD58, Printed: 1910. This will be why no map came up earlier for 1909 but one came up for 1919 when I was using the “Select basemap” icon.
Step Seven: Finding out which map you are viewing. When a map is on the screen, you can use the icon of the white i in blue circle = “Show mapsheet details for current series when you click on the map”.
This icon also turns green when you click on it. You then click on a point on the map and a popup list appears which identifies the map that is being shown. In the case above, the 1910 map is identified even though the map came onto the screen originally when I was using the “Select basemap” icon and had chosen “NZMS13 1919” from its menu list. In other words, the decade menu list that appears when you click the “Select basemap” icon does not mean that the map that comes up was published the year shown (1919 in this case) but it may have been earlier (1910 in this case).
Over the past few months, I have been doing some research on the district in which I grew up, around Waikaka in Southland, and on the members of my family who first settled there in the 1870s and their involvement in farming and gold dredging. This is an area I return to from time to time, and from which I collect stones. Recently I have been seeing what is available online in terms of historical maps. One very useful website I have discovered is “Maps Past” http://www.mapspast.org.nz which, oddly enough, does not have a page giving details of who has produced the site.
The opening page of “Maps Past” presents a map of New Zealand, and it is possible to zoom into any particular part of the country. Then you are able to click on different dates (set as decades, starting at 1899 with only 1939 not available) and bring up maps from that time of the area on your screen. Sometimes as you go from one decade to another, the same map will be presented, depending on when new maps were constructed. I will illustrate this by showing the different maps available for Waikaka and the area to the south which includes “The Mains”, the farm on which I grew up.
There are nine different maps that are available for the Waikaka area, one of which is a recent aerial photo. The following are thumbnails that will expand when clicked on (there is a “View full size” underneath the expanded image in the viewer – you may need to scroll down to see it):
This first part of this Topic will deal with the first four of these maps. The other five are dealt with in Maps as a Resource: New Zealand’s “Maps Past”, Part Two. Note that the following map images are not expandable – use the thumbnail above for a more detailed view of any of the maps.
The first map is for the decade ending in 1899. It is actually from a map of the Chatton Survey District published in 1888:
It is interesting to note the areas around Waikaka designated as “Auriferous Reserve” and “Gold Reserve”, and the area of dots to the southeast of the town labelled “GOLD WORKINGS” (though it is very difficult to see this label). Gold had been discovered near Waikaka in 1867 and the following 60 years saw various phases of panning, mining, sluicing and dredging. Section 30 of Block 3, located directly south of Waikaka, just below the centre of the map, was bought in April 1876 by Hugh Paterson, my great-great-grandfather. This was the beginnings of “The Mains” farm.
The second map is for the decade ending in 1929. It is actually from a map of the Chatton Survey District published in 1929:
One noticeable addition to the map is the Waikaka Branch Railway, constructed in 1907 and 1908 to provide faster transport of agricultural produce to markets. It was the last of the branch lines authorised in northern Southland. In “Waikaka Saga” (1962), Evans refers to James Paterson, my great-grandfather, as one of the “well-known characters” (page 191) on the train, one of the local land-owners who traveled to Gore (about 25 kms away) on Saturdays to do business. “All of these men were intensely interested in politics, religion, world affairs, agriculture, and so on. Even before the train had pulled out of Waikaka station, the argument had started and they had forgotten to buy their tickets, and so scrambled on at the last moment…[They] used to have great arguments and discussions on the train, so much so that it became quite an institution.” The railway line ran through “The Mains”, with the Pullar Railway Station (Siding) located just on the southern boundary of the farm. It is reported in the Mataura Ensign on 27 July 1909 that James Paterson was given 50 acres of the Waikaka Commonage (mining reserve) to compensate for part of The Mains being cut off from access to water. Due to competition from roading, the Waikaka Branch Railway closed on 9 September 1962 (Wikipedia).
In the middle of “The Mains” was a rail bridge across the “Waikaka Stream”. Soon after the line opened, Leonard Paterson, my grandfather, traveled to high school in Gore by train which would slow down by this bridge so he could hop on (“Paterson Family Reunion 2002”, page 24). He was also a passenger on the final train from Waikaka in 1962, standing sixth from the right in the photo below, his wife Annie to his right. They had retired to live in Gore in 1957.
Source: “Waikaka and District Schools Centennial 1883-1983 Pictorial”, page 71
The third map is for the decade ending in 1959. It is actually from a map of the NZMS1 series published in 1946, the S161 “Heriot” Sheet. This is a topographic map, showing relief, using contour lines, whereas the previous two are land survey maps primarily concerned to present farm land boundaries.
This is the same map with the approximate boundary (in black) of “The Mains”:
Note that the road running east of the boundary of “The Mains” is called “Turnbulls Road” (after a prominent family) . In later maps this becomes “Turnbull Road”. Note also that “Tailings” are indicated in “The Mains” to the left of the railway line. Elsewhere on the map is reference to “Workings” and “Old Workings”. These are old gold dredge tailings and sluicing areas. Most of the flat land along the west and east branches of the Waikaka Stream as far south as McNab (21 kms) was heavily dredged between 1896 and 1926. As reported in an entry on “Gold-Dredging in the Waikaka Valley” in “The New Zealand Mining Handbook” of 1906, “By means of a separating-box soil and sand are distributed over the tailings, which are left perfectly level, and when sown with clover and grass yield excellent grazing” (page 198). In “Golden Reflections: A History of Waikaka Valley” (1992), J.F. McArthur reports: “Dredging operations disturbed the whole valley floor, which was completely turned over to the depth of 12 to 14 feet [3.7 to 4.3 metres]” (page 366). He refers to how the dredges lifted the top soil of the area about to be dredged and placed it, using an extended chute, over the area previously dredged (page 367). It has been claimed that much swampy land was improved considerably by gold dredging. Certainly I remember the tailings on “The Mains”, although prone to drying out in summer, provided great free-draining winter grazing and grew excellent lucerne (alfalfa).
The fourth map is for the decade ending in 1969. The “Maps Past” website indicates this is based on the NZMS1 series “Heriot” Sheet published in 1957, again a topographic map:
However, only parts of the railway line are indicated even though it was not removed until after 1962, when I remember my father dismantling the section that ran through “The Mains”. Maybe this is actually based on a later map. A new “Old Workings” label appears on the map to the south of “The Mains” boundary. These old gold dredge ponds on the Waikaka Stream existed even prior to the previous map. I used to fish for trout there often as a boy, and we called it Turnbull’s Dam as it is located on Turnbull’s farm (even though it is a couple of ponds through which the river flows rather than a dam). It is interesting to note on this map that the road in the south-east corner is called “Sandy Knowes Road”. On later maps this becomes the “Kelso Maitland Road” before becoming “Glenkenich Road”. Meanwhile, the road in the north-east is on this map called the “Waikaka Kelso Road” (the “Kelso” part can’t be read on this segment) and on the next map is called “Sandy Knowes Road”. (On all maps, “Garden Gully Road” connects these two roads.) There is potential confusion here for local historians when local people or documents refer to Sandy Knowes.
I recently saw part of an animated documentary on National Geographic about what can be found as you move from the Earth’s surface to its centre. “Down to the Earth’s Core”, a 90 minute film released in 2012, uses often spectacular computer generated imagery. An earthquake inside the San Andreas Fault is shown, along with an erupting volcano and bizarre cave-dwelling creatures. Earth’s extraordinary history is laid bare, layer by layer. A number of fascinating stories are told in the course of the journey downwards, such as how prehistoric forests became modern-day fuel and how dinosaurs experienced cataclysmic death. Eventually the planet’s super-heated liquid core is reached.
Some of the highlights for me are listed below, along with how many minutes they can be found into the YouTube video above: the Carlsbad Caverns of New Mexico, 240 metres below the surface (at 9.00 minutes); a cave of giant crystals, 300 metres deep (at 20.17 minutes); the layer of extraterrestrial iridium rock at 550 metres and its link to dinosaur extinction (at 25.45 minutes); the accumulation of gold deposits nearly 2 kms down (at 34.22 minutes); the formation of amethyst quartz crystals at 3.9 kms (at 38.42 minutes); and how diamonds came to be, at 240 kms down (at 1 hour 8.40 minutes).