Alert Level Two, Wednesday 20 May – Stone 4, Polished Cloudy-Green Stone from Riverton

I found this stone on the Back Beach, Riverton, but I am unable to identify it. It has a couple of small patches of white quartz in it, and the close-up views suggest it may be a kind of stained quartz. One of its significant features is the cloud of green found mainly on one side. It has polished well, with just one small rough area close to the largest white quartz patch. 

Close-ups of the stone reveal characteristics of its quartz make-up and its green staining:

 

Alert Level Two, Saturday 16 May – Stone 2, “Marble-Type” from Riverton

This stone comes from the Back Beach, Riverton. It is what I call a “South Coast marble type” stone. These come in predominantly white or yellow, with black or rust-coloured veins. As noted in the Post on Stone of the Day Eighteen, this type of stone can be difficult to polish and often has patches of roughness or tiny holes that can be difficult to remove.

Stone 2 of Level Two has polished with very few “imperfections”. And its patterns are intriguing:

The stone has a deeper colour than most “South Coast marble type” pebbles. This meant that the preparation of the images for this Post included the challenge of “lightening” it whereas most stone images require a “deepening” of hue.

This is  an example of a stone which, when polished, fulfilled the promise it showed when first picked up off the beach.

LDOL3 Stone #1, Monday 11 May 2020

Last Days of Level 3, Stone #1, is the start of a new series of recently polished stones from TumbleStone. Posts will be made every Monday, Wednesday and Saturday, with the intention of Postings throughout what remains of Covid-19 Alert Level 3 in New Zealand, and then during Alert Level 2. The Prime Minister announces later today when the country will move out of Alert Level 3 (the move will probably take place sometime this week).

LDOL3 Stone #1 is a recently polished stone from Riverton, collected from the beach in 2019.

It is a dark stone but its light yellow-brown patches caught my eye on the beach. They add colour and interest. There are a couple of tiny holes in it but apart from them, it has polished well.

 

Stay-at-Home Day Thirty-Two, Sunday 26 April 2020: Stone Thirty-Two

Stone Thirty-Two comes off the Back Beach at Riverton.

It is a mix of medium sized black and white grains or crystals. I don’t know what kind of stone it is. 

The next Post in this Series is Final Stay-at-Home Day, Monday 27 April 2020: Stone Thirty-Three. The first Post is Stay-at-Home Day One, Thursday 26 March 2020: Stone One. 

Stay-at-Home Day Six, Tuesday 31 March 2020: Stone Six

Above are the first five stones already presented in this Series. The first Post is Stay-at-Home Day One.

The stone in the photo below can be found at Gemstone Beach and Riverton. It is not plentiful and sometimes I might find only one or two during a week of beach visits although at other times I can collect six or seven good specimens. 

00
Stone Six: Ignimbrite stone from south coast of South Island.
02
Stone Six: Polished banded ignimbrite stone.
01b
Stone Six: Polished ignimbrite.

I came across a small number of these stones during my early stone collecting trips about three years ago and they caught my attention because of the banding and colour. They conjure up for me images of deep space and galaxies and stars, and the rings of planet Saturn.

Although the stone is hard and glassy in character, it can be hard to find specimens that are not cracked or chipped, and sometimes there are tiny gaseous pockets that prevent a smooth surface. I have been fortunate to find some that have polished well.

It is the presence of tiny gaseous pockets (see close-up photos below) that gives a big clue that this is a volcanic rock. It is probably ignimbrite. Ignimbrite originates as the deposit of a pyroclastic flow, which is a hot suspension of particles and gases flowing explosively and rapidly from a volcano. New Zealand geologist Patrick Marshall originally came up with the term in the 1930s meaning “rain of fiery rock dust” (from the Latin “igni” for fire and “imbri” for rain). Some ignimbrite can be very loosely deposited, with lots of pumice in it. If it is buried at depth, it becomes compacted, gases and liquids are squeezed out, and it becomes solid and fine grained and glassy.

Initially I identified these stones as rhyolite, another volcanic rock, based on information provided by a couple of fellow rockhounds. When I emailed photos of the stones to a New Zealand geologist, he generously provided me with a detailed analysis of them, suggesting they were a type of ignimbrite. He wrote: “My guess is that they were eroded from areas of the latest Jurassic/earliest Cretaceous Loch Burn Formation of eastern Fiordland” and came down the Waiau River to the coast. 

I have found some large specimens of this stone, especially at Gemstone Beach. The one below left I left on the beach but I managed to get the one on the right home though it is too big to be tumble-polished:

I have already polished a number of ignimbrites and there are more awaiting polishing in the future (see photos below). The Whanganui Rock and Mineral Club was scheduled to have a Show next month and I had planned to develop a display of Gemstone Beach stones with ignimbrites being one of three featured groups. However, as you can guess, the Show has been cancelled – we are all still going to be staying-at-home on 18 April.

The next Post in this Series is Stay-at-Home Day Seven.

Stay-at-Home Day Two, Friday 27 March 2020: Stone Two

Stone Two was found on the Back Beach at Riverton last year, at the end of the road, on the shores of Foveaux Strait, with Rakiura/Stewart Island in the background. I think it is a quartzite stone, with lace-like tendrils spread throughout. As I have stated in a previous Post, Quartzites are not as common along the south coast as at Birdlings Flat in Canterbury, but I always find a couple of excellent ones at Riverton and Orepuki. They polish well, often have great colour, have interesting veins through them, and there’s a depth to them that makes them intriguing.

A quartzite starts off as a quartz-rich sandstone, a sedimentary rock that is grainy and feels like sandpaper. When the sandstone is exposed to high temperatures and pressures, the hard glassy metamorphic rock of quartzite is formed. Quartzite’s wide variety of colours are a result of minor amounts of impurities being incorporated with the quartz during the process of metamorphism. It is often the cloudy or lace-like trails of impurities that provide the most fascinating aspect of a quartzite stone.

3b
Stone Two: Polished quartzite stone from the Back Beach, Riverton
4
Stone Two: Other side of polished quartzite stone from the Back Beach, Riverton

Next Post in this Series is Stay-at-Home Day Three.

TumbleStone Calendar 2020

Happy New Year wishes to everyone!

In December I moved house from Cambridge to Whanganui. Everything was shifted by Christmas, and most of the unpacking has now been done.

However, the shed I will use for tumble polishing is still in the process of preparation.

Early in January, after the moving and unpacking, I quickly put together a calendar for 2020, using Diamond Photo online. For each month, the Calendar has a set of photos, just slightly smaller than an A4 page, with another A4 size page below it containing the month’s dates. The main internationally-recognised holidays are noted, along with some of the main New Zealand ones.

I was very pleased with the quality of the finished product.

If you want to buy one for yourself, email me at john.tumblestone@gmail.com. It will cost you $25 (postage included, in New Zealand).

The following are the sets of photos for each month in the Calendar – these are all photos I took in 2019, most but not all of which appeared on TumbleStone blog last year:
January – Riverton scenes
February – Close-ups of Gemstone Beach stones
March – Fossil worm casts in rocks at Tihaka Beach, near Riverton
April – Hydrogrossular garnets
May – Gemstone Beach scenes
June – Fossil worm cast stones
July – Larger stones found on Gemstone Beach and the beach near McCracken’s Rest
August – Polished stones from Gemstone Beach
September – Henderson Bay scenes, Riverton
October – Polished stones, collected by my sister Helen on Gemstone Beach
November – Close-ups of fossil worm cast traces
December – Polished stones, collected by Sam, my sister’s grandson, on Gemstone Beach.

Visiting the South Coast

I am currently based in Riverton for a few days. The rough weather is restricting stone collecting. Had a brief visit to Gemstone Beach yesterday morning, where the waves were powerful and it was not possible to get past the Taunoa Stream. Made another quick trip to the Back Beach at Riverton late yesterday afternoon and found some nice fossil worm cast stones with the help of my sister Helen. Weather is windy and cold, and a storm this morning prevented a planned trip to the Orepuki area, but it will improve, hopefully…

The Fossilised Worm Cast Stones of Gemstone Beach and Riverton – Part Four: Ichnogenus Protovirgularia and the Permian Rocks of the Eglinton Valley

It can often be difficult for the non-expert like myself to identify a stone. Consulting books or the internet about different rock and mineral types can be frustrating because you can often find three or four possibilities that might match your stone. Moreover, your stone might have some characteristics that appear to be unique and not present in any of the “pure” types included in the books. There may be clues in how locals refer to a stone, though even they can be mistaken. You may be lucky enough to come across a reference to your stone by an expert somewhere, or you might even be fortunate enough to contact an expert who can help you.

This Post is part of a series on what are called “fossilised worm cast stones” found on Gemstone Beach and the beaches of Riverton in Southland. I have not come across any authoritative reference to them anywhere in the literature or online. Until now. Recently I received information on them from two different sources. This Post reports on the first source, and the next Post (not yet available) reports on the second. (The first Post in the Series can be found here.)

A FOSSIL TRAIL, ICHNOGENUS PROTOVIRGULARIA, POSSIBLY FROM NUCULA, A SMALL BIVALVE

In early July I emailed the following seven photos to someone I know in a University Department of Geology.

“The stones contain what are probably fossilised traces of worms”, I wrote. “I would like to identify the kind of rocks the stones come from, what kind of worm is involved, and when they were active (in other words, when did they start becoming fossilised).” My inquiry was passed on to another geologist with expertise in ichnology (the study of trace fossils) who replied: “Yes, a trail, probably ichnogenus Protovirgularia, usually attributed to a small bivalve such as Nucula. I’ve seen it in float boulders in the Eglinton and very similar pebbles on the East shore of Te Anau, where it is likely from the Permian.”

It seems to me that five points follow from this information:

1) The traces on the stones are trails . If this term is taken strictly and narrowly, then a “trail” is left behind on the surface of sediment by the movement of an animal. A “trail” is not a “burrow” nor a “cast” (excretion). However, a looser definition of a “trail” could include “burrow” and “cast”, so it is important to keep an open mind on this.

2) The trace is called ichnogenus Protovirgularia. My initial research into this term reveals the following. “Ichnogenus” is a category of taxonomy (a way of grouping similar things) for trace fossils. A “genus” is an intermediate category between “species” and “family”. In relation to the term “Protovirgularia”, “Virgularia” is a genus of sea pen in the family Virgulariidae (sea pens were discussed in Part Two in this series of Posts), and “Proto” means original, primitive, first or earliest. For a number of weeks I was not able to find out why this group of trace fossils was given the term “Protovirgularia” – I thought that maybe it was initially thought to have been made by a sea pen. It is reasonably well-established now that in the vast majority of cases the pattern is made by bivalves, though it can be made by other invertebrates (this may be the subject of a later Post). I was eventually able to find a copy online of the original article that first identified protovirgularia. It was written by Frederick McCoy (Professor of Geology and Mineralogy, Queen’s College, Belfast) in 1850 in the “Annals and Magazine of Natural History“. On page 272, McCoy wrote: “…In the form of its axis and the structure of the transversely ridged celluliferous pinnae, both in the curved extended, and in the straight contracted states, it perfectly resembles the recent Virgularia mirabilis…” (my underlining).

McCoy 1850 ab
Source: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/102950#page/302/mode/1up

In his 1850 article, McCoy also referred to Protovirgularia dichotoma which varied a little from the basic Protovirgularia he first described.

Below are photos of Virgularia mirabilis, also known as the slender sea-pen. The photo of a dead one on the far right below shows the resemblance noted by McCoy to the fossil he had observed, and he believed it to be of a primitive ancestor of this animal. It was not until 1958 that the fossil was identified as a trace fossil made by a different animal.

One academic source defines ichnogenus Protovirgularia as a small keel-like trail which is composed of an elevated median line and lateral wedge-shaped appendages alternating on both sides (see also the entry in FossilID). The following description of Protovirgularia dichotoma is very interesting in relation to the trace fossils found at Riverton and Gemstone Beach because of reference to chevrons (v-shaped patterns). This source describes Protovirgularia dichotoma trace fossils as “horizontal or subhorizontal cylindrical burrows, trapezoidal, almond-shaped, or triangular in cross-section, distinctly or indistinctly bilobated [having two lobes]. Internal structure, if preserved, is formed by successive pads of sediment that may be expressed as ribs on the exterior. Ribs arranged in chevron-shaped, biserial pattern along external or internal dorsal part.” Below are examples.

pv dich slide
Examples of Protovirgularia dichotoma from Spain. Source: https://www.slideshare.net/JordiMaria/bivalvia-2006-tt-compr

The photo below contains four examples of protovirgularia trace fossil specimens from Japan, discussed in a 2011 article in the academic journal “Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology”. The variations within the protovirgularia grouping is shown. Note too that these are three-dimensional traces in contrast to the trace in the Gemstone Beach and Riverton stones that have been subject to “flattening” by the smoothing action of the river and ocean.

The diagram below is from a 2010 article on protovirgularia found in Patagonia, Argentina, published in the “Journal of Paleontology”. Again, the significant variety in the forms of this trace shape is demonstrated. Forms #3, #4 and #5 on the diagram look at first sight to be closest to the well-defined chevron shaped traces often found in the Gemstone Beach and Riverton stones.

carmona et al fig 4
Morphologic variations of Protovirgularia. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240776411_Taphonomy_and_Paleoecology_of_the_Bivalve_Trace_Fossil_Protovirgularia_in_Deltaic_Heterolithic_Facies_of_the_Miocene_Chenque_Formation_Patagonia_Argentina

3) Despite its name linking it to sea pens, it seems that this type of fossil trail, “ichnogenus Protovirgularia”, is usually thought to be left behind by a small bivalve. A “bivalve” is an aquatic mollusc which has a compressed body enclosed within a hinged shell, such as a clam, oyster, mussel, or scallop. Bivalves have inhabited the Earth for over 500 million years. They especially flourished in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras (the last 250 million years). The excellent British Geological Survey entry on bivalves as fossils shows how they are able to burrow into sediment. One article in the journal “Ichnos” in 2010, again on protovirgularia from Argentina, gives the following account of the link between the trace and bivalves: it is a locomotion trace produced by bivalves, a burrow resulting from the rhythmic action of a muscular cleft-foot (page 42). Nucula is a genus of very small saltwater clams, according to Wikipedia (see photo, below left, of Nucula in Te Papa Museum and, below right, Auckland Museum).

These clams are very ancient, having been around for the last 450 million years or so, and have been very common around the world. They can reach a size of up to 30 millimetres and  live in the muddy sand close to the sediment surface at an oceanic depth of 20 to 200 metres. It is thought that the movement of Nucula leaves behind the “ichnogenus Protovirgularia” trace shape. However, I assume there is also the possibility that maybe something else could leave that trace shape.

4) The trace fossil shapes found in the stones at Orepuki and Riverton have also been found on float boulders in the Eglinton River and in pebbles on the East shore of Lake Te Anau. The Eglinton River flows into Lake Te Anau at a middle point along the lake’s eastern shore, having made its way there from the north-north-east: 

A “float” rock is a loose piece of rock that is not connected to an outcrop, that is, it has been removed and transported from its place of origin, especially by gravity, ice, water or people. This often makes it difficult for a geologist to identify float rocks. In relation to the terms “boulders” and “pebbles”, when it comes to the sizes of float rocks, geologists use a set of categories. One such set is as follows: A “grain” (e.g., of sand) has a diameter of 2 to 4 millimetres, a “pebble” is between 2 and 64 millimetres, a “cobble” is 64 to 256 millimetres in diameter, and a “boulder” is larger than 256 millimetres. 

5) These trace fossils were likely laid down in the Permian period. The Permian spans 47 million years from the end of the Carboniferous period about 300 million years ago to the beginning of the Triassic period about 250 million years ago. The world at the time was dominated by two continents known as Pangaea and Siberia (the latter also known as Angaraland), surrounded by a global ocean called Panthalassa. The New Zealand area was on the southeast part of Pangaea and with it moved around the southern part of the globe, including over the South Pole area.

This is how a University of Waikato website, by the Biology and Earth Sciences Departments, describes the Permian context of New Zealand and some of its local geological happenings:

By Permian times, the continents were moving even closer together than during the Carboniferous as the northern and southern supercontinents of Laurasia and Gondwana began to assemble into a single great landmass, called Pangaea. The Permian period was the final period of the Paleozoic era and is named after the province of Perm, Russia, where rocks of this age were first studied.

The global geography of the Permian included massive areas of land and water. Models indicate that the interior regions of this vast continent were probably dry, with great seasonal fluctuations, because of the lack of the moderating effect of nearby bodies of water, and that only some parts of the supercontinent received rainfall throughout the year. The ocean itself still has little known about it. There was extensive glaciation in southern parts of the landmass, shown by glacial striations on Permian rocks from what are now Africa, South America, and Antarctica, and extensive deposits of windblown soil indicate a very dry climate. However, there are indications that the climate of the Earth shifted at this time, and that glaciation decreased, as the interiors of continents became drier.

One of the most striking transitions in the evolution of life occurred when mammals evolved from one lineage of reptiles. This transition began during the Permian…

Permian rocks are widely distributed in New Zealand’s South Island and also occur in the Northland region of the North Island, where they are the oldest known rocks. In some places the deep sedimentary marine series that was laid down is up to 20 kilometres thick and one of the most complete Permian sequences preserved anywhere in the world. The biggest build up of volcanic rocks made the Takitimu Mountains near Redcliff, Waiau Valley, where the pile of tuff layers is 14 kilometres thick. Unfortunately Permian fossil outcrops are hard to find, but at Arthurton, near Gore, complete shells of Atomodesma, a bivalve, can be found. And of course a whole leaf of Glossopteris plant has been found at Productus Creek…

There is no mention of the Permian trace fossils of Southland but the rocks in which they occurred, which would likely have bordered on the Waiau Valley, including the Eglinton Valley, are identified in general terms.

As Te Ara The Encyclopedia of New Zealand notes, the end of the Permian period marks earth’s largest ever extinction – two-thirds of plant and animal life died out, probably as a result of a sudden climate change.

**************

The next Post in this Series is “’Burrowing Worms’ of the Permian in Brook Street Terrane Rocks East of Tihaka Beach”.

Diane’s Stone, and an Introduction to Jasper

Just under a year ago, my niece Diane bought a new house in Christchurch. While doing work in the garden, she found a stone that she thought was potentially interesting. She showed it to me when I was visiting her and I recognised it as jasper. The stone was in a rough condition. It was far from smooth, and running through the middle was a brittle and pitted silica band. The photos below are of the stone after it was washed and allowed to dry:

I thought that tumbling it would at least bring out the colour, so I offered to take it away to work on it.

What is jasper? Jasper is a well-known red stone found on many beaches in New Zealand, especially in the South Island. I have found it on beaches like Birdlings Flat in Canterbury, and at Riverton and Gemstone Beach in Southland. It tends to stand out amongst other stones because of its deep red colour:

I once found a rock in a track on the farm I grew up on, The Mains near Waikaka. When trying to identify it, I thought first of all that it was chert but it turned out to be jasper (Minerals.net states that “when Jasper is dull and lacking interesting colors or patterns, it is not Jasper but rather Chert”). I eventually broke it up, with difficulty – to put it technically, jasper “fractures conchoidally” (like flint – Geology.com points out that jasper, chert and flint are very similar, all being varieties of opaque microcrystalline quartz). When polished, the pieces of the rock I found had a very glossy, almost waxy, quality. 

I later discovered that jasper is very common around the Waikaka area, being part of the gold-bearing quartz gravels of the area – see the Tumblestone Posts “Jasper Stones and Petrified Wood, Shepherd’s Creek, Waikaka” and “Waikaka’s Auriferous (Gold-Containing) Quartz Gravels“.

In Riverton, outside the museum Te Hikoi, a number of rocks from Southland are on display. One of them is a large piece of rounded jasper. Inside the museum, a number of smaller jasper stones are displayed, including a dark green one.

When I recently visited Jack Geerlings in Winton, who has an extensive collection of stones and rocks from southern New Zealand, I noticed he had a number of pieces of jasper (see photos below). He had collected some from the Coromandel Peninsula, in the North Island, and generously gave me a piece. Outside his shed, where he had a number of rocks and boulders on display, a rock of red and green jasper can be seen. And inside his shed, he showed me a polished stone of orbicular jasper. In her book “Collecting Rocks, Gems and Minerals” (3rd edition, 2016), Patti Polk has an extensive section on different types of jasper. On pages 121 and 122, in her entry on orbicular jasper, she states: “Orbicular jasper is generally a type of highly silicified rhyolite or tuff that has quartz and feldspar crystallized into radical aggregates of needle-like crystals that form orbicular or spherical structures.” The photos below include page 122 from her book, illustrating some of the variants of orbicular jasper.

To find out more about jasper, I consulted one of my books, “The Illustrated Guide to Rocks and Minerals” (2015) by John Farndon. On page 204, he notes that jasper is a red, green or yellow variety of chalcedony. Chalcedony arises when quartz crystals forms at low temperatures in volcanic cavities. The crystals can be so small that they are visible only when magnified, which is the meaning of the term “cryptocrystalline”. The general name for cryptocrystalline quartz (also called “microcrystalline”) is chalcedony, which comes in a vast array of colours and patterns. As Farndon notes, it includes blood-red carnelian, wine-red jasper, brown-banded agate, green-moss agate, apple-green chrysoprase, and black and white onyx. The colour depends on what minerals seep into the rock. The presence of iron causes the red colour in jasper. In fact, jasper is often referred to as a coloured form of opaque agate, agate being one of the major types of chalcedony (see, for example, the wikipedia entry on chalcedony).

Mindat.org has a lot of photos of different variations of jasper. Below are also photos of some different types of jasper, with the one on the right showing rough and tumbled stones.

To get back to Diane’s jasper stone: After tumbling for just over a week (9 days and 19 hours, to be precise) in 220 silicon carbide grit (along with other stones), followed by five and a half hours tumbling in water and sunlight soap, the stone’s colours emerged much more clearly. Nevertheless, it was still rough in places, with the middle band of silica especially pitted:

However, the stone showed promise. I next tumbled it in 320 silicon carbide grit for another week (seven days and one hour to be exact), followed by 21 hours in sunlight soap. There was a small improvement in the surface condition of the stone, though of course the pits in the middle silica band were too deep to erode away:

I next tumbled the stone in pre-polish tin oxide for five days, followed by a 21 hour soap tumble. Then it spent nearly 12 days in pro-polish tin oxide, finally spending just over four days in a borax burnishing tumble. Unfortunately, these stages seemed to bring out various lines of weakness in the stone, and it failed to take a polish. I didn’t think that further tumbling would improve it:

While I found this disappointing, it is not unusual for some jasper. Many of the jasper stones found on the beach have a chip out of them or some kind of crack. There is often a brittleness in jasper that gives rise to this. 

At least Diane now has a much cleaner and more colourful stone.